Could a Human Mother give birth to a 'implanted' Primate embryo?

1.:I could imagine that cells implanted into a surrogate mother could be brought to a resulting birth.

Thinkable, but improbable.

2.I would suspect that the "off springs" DNA would not change, even if implanted into a human.

3.Still doubting the change of DNA, provided the parents were both human or, as in no.2 primates.

Some things will not work. Even though the human DNA & DNS are very much the same as in primates, human cells would attack the foreign cells as intruders and kill them. Even at the cost of eliminating the human. Even pigs are up to 92 % identical to humans, but I have only heard of human pigs referring to their behaviour. Not their ancestry or looks.

I read an article about african wildcat embryos grown in vitro and implanted into a domesticated "house" cat....which apparently worked but you cant believe everything you read on the internet....

I would imagine that the human would morethanlikely reject the primate embryo as a foreign body and not allow implantation or miscarry. Eventhough its from a closely related species theres a high possibility that the embryo would'nt stimulate the neccessary hormones essential to embryonic growth. Or gametic isolation such as the embryo being unable to survive in the reproductive tract of females of another species may be a factor.

For your second part of the question, no the mothers DNA would not be anyway incorporated into the fetus (just like human-human surrogacy...)

Finally for the third part of your question, the same barriers as before would be encountered.

ps. These answers are important to your research.....???

I dont think asking a question to the general public on yahoo is classified as research...

EDIT: i read your other question (where you slated the theory of evolution) and i think that its extremely ignorant to claim that the common ancestor doesnt exist. Do you even know what your talking about??

Asking was it half man half ape really got me questioning your knowledge....

its EVOLUTION!!! and its also a theory, so there are no hard facts as of yet but its BY FAR the most logical explanation. Personally i think we owe our existance to cyanobacteria. Maybe you should read a few books before you come on here with such an ignorant question.

EDIT: If my answer was not "factual" enough for you then i think your best bet would be to stop wasting time on yahoo and go to a library.

If you care to reply feel free to email me.

oh, and evolution is not a religion....its a science.

It's more than likely the body would reject an embryo from a different species so I doubt a human or primate could carry to full term & then give birth to a baby that is not their own species.

DNA is not affected by the host womb so if a primate embryo was implanted into a human womb it would not suddenly aquire human DNA. And vice versa.

The information you require is all out there within public grasp. But as you have given such a pompous response to the good answers on here I will let you locate it yourself. If you're not smart enough to know the basics I very much doubt you could handle the information anyway.

EDIT - Wonderful! I knew you'd bite, lol! Showing your true colours now sweety! And having discussed your question & irrational, over emotional response with my colleagues they agree wholehearedtly with me. You couldn't handle it. There's a reason why the information is difficult to track down for people such as yourself. Have a think about your outburst & you may realise why.

Good question , but not possible DNA not compatible, regardless , they have the same number of organs and limbs

most animals have the same,

the answer is yes under medical supervision

I would say no based on the blood of each is too different.

I think on Planet of the Apes it might be possible. What about if a Chimp gave birth to a human baby? Do you think that could be possible. LOL.

it has already been done! in china in the 50,s a gorila gave birth to a chimp!!!!!!!!

i`ve seen this in a porn film/