Yahoo Answers is shutting down on 4 May 2021 (Eastern Time) and the Yahoo Answers website is now in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

If you had to rate George Bush as either a genius or a moron which would you choose?

Nothing in between. Is he closer to being a genius like Leonardo, Prof Steven Hawking, and Archimedes, OR is he closer to being a moron.

Genius OR Moron? Take your pick and lets see how many agree with you.

28 Answers

Relevance
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago
    Favourite answer

    He is a moron....a war monger!!

    Source(s): Well said Dave J...SPOT ON MATE...
  • 1 decade ago

    I don't think a genius OR a moron would survive for long in American politics. They would be too different from the rest of the herd and the voters wouldn't understand them.

    I thought Bush had some very inspired moments in his first term, particularly in the aftermath of 9/11. His second term, on the other hand, has been nothing short of baffling. He still says some of the right stuff, but then he signs every spending bill. He still says the American voters gave him a mandate, but then he lets government grow ever larger, more unwieldy, and far more dysfunctional.

    I'm not willing to call him a moron but I certainly don't rate him even as far as midline on the scale any longer.

    George Washington and Thomas Jefferson must be rolling in their graves. {sigh}

  • 1 decade ago

    Moron

  • PAUL G
    Lv 5
    1 decade ago

    George Bush gives morons a bad name

  • 1 decade ago

    He is a genius at being a moron.

  • 1 decade ago

    He a Moron

  • Dave J
    Lv 5
    1 decade ago

    Moron everytime!

    Im just wondering why you have given examples of who is a genius, but none for who is a moron?

    Hmmm where will I start......Gordon Brown, Tony Blair, David Blunkett....should I go on?!

  • 1 decade ago

    The dictionary definition of "Moron" is "A person of mild mental retardation having a mental age of from 7 to 12 years". I reckon most 7 - 12 year olds are considerably more intelligent than Bush.

    So perhaps "idiot" would be more a more appropriate choice. Defined as "A person of profound mental retardation having a mental age below three years" and "a person so mentally deficient as to be incapable of ordinary reasoning". The latter definition in particular sounds like a good definition of Bush to me.

    Edit: I really liked Russel Brand's comment about Bush at those music awards the other day, when he referred to him as "that retarded cowboy dude".

  • 1 decade ago

    Technically of course, he is something in between. But if we're dealing in absolutes, I'd love to see him up against Steven Hawking - hell, even Richard Dawkins would be fun. George Bush, regrettably, is towards the lower end of the spectrum. I think Roy Zimmerman said it best, in the song below:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q7r0USHTG7s

  • 1 decade ago

    Moron with a very clever team of publicists behind him.

  • Fuzz
    Lv 4
    1 decade ago

    easy, Moron!

Still have questions? Get answers by asking now.