Yahoo Answers is shutting down on 4 May 2021 (Eastern Time) and the Yahoo Answers website is now in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

wild_eep asked in EnvironmentGlobal Warming · 1 decade ago

I need a new word - can you help?

The word is to describe people who, when faced with environmental problems and some proposed tech or regulatory solutions that will help a lot but will cause some inconvenience, do this:

declare that the PROBLEM is really SOMETHING ELSE and that we are all being comprehensively DUPED by the SANDAL-WEARING THOUGHT POLICE and produce a whole lot of their own imaginary or confused SCIENTIFIC FACTS which they emphasise liberally with CAPITALS

surely this breed needs its own word. What's it to be?

10 Answers

Relevance
  • 1 decade ago
    Favourite answer

    Try "hosts".

    "In biology, a host is an organism that harbors a virus or parasite, or a mutual or commensal symbiont, typically providing nourishment and shelter. In botany, a host plant is one that supplies food resources and substrate for certain insects or other fauna. Examples of such interactions include a cell being host to a virus, a legume plant hosting helpful nitrogen-fixing bacteria, and animals as hosts to parasitic worms, e.g. nematodes."

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Host_(biology)

    Such a label clearly demonstrates the relationship between the "hosts" and those who wish to classify them.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    The logic term for this is "red herring."

    From Wikipedia.......red herring is an argument, given in reply, that does not address the original issue. Critically, a red herring is a deliberate attempt to change the subject or divert the argument. This is known formally in the English vocabulary as a digression which is usually denoted as "red herring".

    It's what is called a "logical fallacy" which is basically something that seems like a logical argument, but isn't.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    Believers

  • 1 decade ago

    I think the word you are looking to describe the people who react with passion as "realists" and now I think I will block yet another non"realist" so I do not get duped into thinking that they have a real question.

  • David
    Lv 7
    1 decade ago

    GlennBeckisteins

    ...you know, those "independent" and "free thinking" followers of whatever their favorite skeptical leader, website or talk show host puts forth as "fact"

  • Ben O
    Lv 6
    1 decade ago

    Infidels, apostates, non-believers, heathens, philistines

    People who refuse to have faith in what they regard as extraordinary claims.

  • 1 decade ago

    I believe the label you're looking for is: egocentric contrarian with a light dusting of "How could I possibly be wrong?"

  • 1 decade ago

    you do not need a new word - use sceptics

  • JimZ
    Lv 7
    1 decade ago

    You can call me a 'GEOLOGIST' or "ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANT"

  • 1 decade ago

    EnviroMENTALISTS

Still have questions? Get answers by asking now.