Yahoo Answers is shutting down on 4 May 2021 (Eastern Time) and the Yahoo Answers website is now in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Why is weed illegal but alcohol and tobacco legal?

All the studies show that weed is less harmful than alcohol and tobacco.

Advocates of weed prohibition claim that they are doing it to protect the public from the health risks, but if that is the case, why aren't alcohol and tobacco also banned? And why aren't dangerous sports like bungee jumping banned if that is the logic?

How is it morally justifiable to punish people for using a less harmful drug whilst ignoring and even advertising other drugs that are considerably more harmful?

Why does the establishment continually refuse to answer the question of why we tolerate the use of alcohol and tobacco in moderation but not cannabis? It is perfectly possible to be a responsible cannabis user, just like it is possible to be a responsible drinker.

Update:

Your answers so far display a staggering degree of ignorance.

You could make the exact same arguments about weed. Plenty of people use it responsibly, so why should they be penalized? And I would beg to differ with your comments on drinking. Our alcoholism rates have skyrocketed and this makes alcohol the primary cause of death for men under 50. Weed has never killed anyone directly and social problems are considerably less than those of alcohol.

Plus there's no evidence illegality decreases or discourages use.

I'm doing no more wrong by smoking a spliff than anyone else is by drinking a beer. There is no morally distinguishing feature between them.

Update 2:

I did not at any point say that weed was harmless or that it does not factor in road accidents, but it makes absolutely no sense to treat what you have quite rightly described as a health issue as a moral and criminal issue when the same logic is not applied to alcohol or tobacco.

There are unquestionably health issues that apply to weed but plenty more apply to legal drugs. If you therefore say, well ok weed is harmful so we should discourage it your answer is to turn to the law? What does that say? The only message it sends out is well, the government doesn't want you to take certain drugs because they are dangerous, but allows you to take even more dangerous ones because of tradition and so on. Users therefore see the faulty logic and take no notice, it undermines other drug classifications as well. To think that users factor in legality when they decide to smoke is an unsupported claim.

Moreover, there is no evidence that making something illegal decreases its use, so the DUI

Update 3:

I think you are forgetting what morality means. No-one is saying second hand smoke isn't harmful. I am talking about smoking a spliff by yourself, and enjoying a pint by yourself. Both have the potential to cause harm, but why should responsible drinkers be penalized for irresponsible drinkers? The same argument applies to marijuana. Most of the people arrested for possession aren't doing anyone any harm but themselves, so it is hardly moral to arrest them.

Your logic assumes that the law is there for good reason. it is not. Alcohol is legal because of lobbying and the amount of money it generates. Cannabis is not illegal because of its harms, or else everything harmful would be banned. Which leads me to believe that it is illegal because of vested interests and corruption.

You need to question the law more. Why does the law have the right to penalize me for ingesting a relatively safe substance when it doesn't have the right to stop me engaging in dangerous activities li

9 Answers

Relevance
  • 7 years ago
    Favourite answer

    Cannabis is a hallucinatory drug and a single dose of this drug may cause an acute mental illness in which serious delusions, high excitement and violence may occur. Long-continued heavy use is widely believed to induce apathy and lead to withdrawal from normal society; this is the basis of its prohibition by international convention. There is also evidence that it can cause serious brain damage.

    100% of Heroin junkies started on Cannabis.

    Source(s): Medical studies
  • Paul
    Lv 7
    7 years ago

    If cannabis was introduced when tobacco was introduced and the government got as much tax off it then I'm sure it would be legal.

    Morally I agree with you entirely alcohol and tobacco should indeed be banned but we all saw how that turned out with prohibition in the USA.

    Once something highly addictive is allowed to become legal and it becomes popular it is difficult if not impossible to go back and make it illegal, especially when those very same drugs hold the law makers themselves in their grip.

    Politics is not the same as idealism. Politics is about compromise and practicality. You are talking about idealism and in this area even the most idealistic among us has to doff our hat to the practical problems of making people do what's good for them.

    On an idealistic note, there are two forms of government that we can adopt.

    Anarchism and fascism. History and current affairs teaches us neither of these government systems is in any way desirable.

    All other government systems will necessarily involve some kind of compromise and therefore hypocrisy which is why they are political and not idealistic.

    Edit:

    Morally smoking a spliff would be no more harmful than drinking alcohol if alcohol were prohibited OR if weed were legal. Although I wouldn't compare it to alcohol You are conveniently ignoring the consequences of second hand smoke so a better moral comparison would be to smoking tobacco if that were illegal.

    If weed is illegal where you come from you should think a lot harder about the morality of disobeying the laws of your society. Should you only obey laws you agree with? What if your neighbour feels anyone who takes drugs deserves to die and feels as selective with murder laws as you do about drug laws?

    There is a morality to obeying the law even when it is inconvenient or against our personal interests and if you want to get into the philosophy of that there isn't space here so read Plato's Phaedo.

  • 7 years ago

    Weed is an hallucinogen, and only used to get stoned. Tobacco and alcohol are not primarily used to get high or drunk. Most people do not abuse alcohol, nor do they reach the point of intoxication. You cite the worst case scenarios with alcohol, but 85% of people are not alcoholics, and maintain perfect health with their moderate consumption.

    Alcoholics STILL account for less than 10% of those who consume alcohol, and fewer than 20% get drunk routinely.. 90% of pot smokers get stoned while using. Plain and simple. Most drinkers consume less than 2 drinks per day, if that. You forget that almost all adult use alcohol...you seem to focus exclusively on those who abuse.

    And nearly all studies indicate that smoking weed is just as harmful to the lungs as tobacco.

    Just regurgitating High Times biased stats is a form of ignorance yourself. Did you know that 2nd most common DUI citation is from pot smoking? Almost 15% of DUI's were given to stoned drivers, and they account for 20% of intoxicated fatalities on the road, according to the NTSB.

    Not sure why pot smokers recoil and reject any statistics that indicates pot smoking is not as harmless or fatal as they believes, with multiple serious health and societal drawbacks. The reason the more serious consequences are hidden is the low number of people using on a consistent basis (compared to alcohol or tobacco), and that the primary abusers are the youth. Pot smoking is a cumulative destroyer.

  • Anonymous
    7 years ago

    Because the people making the unfair laws are getting paid large sums of money to keep it illegal while making a fortune letting people drink themselves to death. It was made illegal because of racism and kept that way by corporations who would lose money if it were legalized. Now Americans know the truth it won't be illegal much longer anywhere.

  • 7 years ago

    There really is no reason, at least no sensible one. Some people just totally disregard studies frightened to be told they're wrong or something. Now you could say 'oh but outlawing tobacco and alcohol is just impossible now' but that would just be a ridiculous reason. Weed is still sold, just like cocaine, just like just about anything illegal, only trouble is it's hard to find and you can be arrested for illegally owning it. Again, either people are totally blind for the truth or just stick to their believes. One of the few reasons why I'm glad to live in the Netherlands is that stuff like this gets treated the same way as other soft drugs.

    Also, weed has been shown to be less damaging than at least tobacco (comparing it to alcohol is a bit hard as it's consumed in an entirely different way). Tobacco is addictive thus you should compare a higher dose of tobacco to a normal dose of weed. Tobacco causes all kinds of diseases to your lungs such as cancer, weed has a lot less diseases or lower chance of getting a disease. Well guess this was a bit of my rant as well.

  • ?
    Lv 7
    7 years ago

    All the studies?!?

    You clearly haven't read all the studies.

    Spare us the whining until you have.

  • ?
    Lv 6
    7 years ago

    Life's may seem unfair.....you just have to deal with

  • ?
    Lv 6
    7 years ago

    Congratulations...you are the 100,000,000,000,000th person to ask this question on this website.

  • 7 years ago

    cause doing weed makes you 'cool' these days. we don't need our youth to become even more dumb.

Still have questions? Get answers by asking now.