Yahoo Answers is shutting down on 4 May 2021 (Eastern Time) and the Yahoo Answers website is now in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

?
Lv 7
? asked in Politics & GovernmentPolitics · 6 years ago

Do you think on-the-spot memorials at crash sites and the like could distract drivers, potentially causing more deaths?

Update:

There are ever-increasing numbers of places where people leave flowers,

teddy bears, candles, and other things to denote that someone was killed there

in an incident involving one or more vehicles.

I maintain that these ever-more-numerous sites are increasing the chance that

drivers will be distracted and may thereby result in yet more injuries and deaths.

Update 2:

I would like to see all such roadside memorials removed,

and significant fines imposed on anyone who sets up a new one.

5 Answers

Relevance
  • Shilo
    Lv 7
    5 years ago

    Yes, not only do I think on-the-spot memorials at crash sites definitely are a distraction, it is a type of theft of property. Victims' families claim these sites as their own with no purchase, no legal contract...nothing. There is one such memorial site in my neighborhood that the family of a deceased police officer has maintained with balloons, pictures, flowers, etc for at least the past year.....enough is enough.

  • ?
    Lv 7
    6 years ago

    Yes

  • David
    Lv 7
    6 years ago

    To the contrary, I think they make a person pause to be more careful when they see what could happen if they don't pay attention.

  • ?
    Lv 7
    6 years ago

    No most of them are ignored as they have sadly become all too common.

  • 6 years ago

    I wouldn't have thought so, they are usually decrete, there is one just around this corner, there it is, .. ¥#@! some bastard has just rear ended me...

Still have questions? Get answers by asking now.