Yahoo Answers is shutting down on 4 May 2021 (Eastern Time) and the Yahoo Answers website is now in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Scott
Lv 6
Scott asked in Politics & GovernmentPolitics · 4 months ago

Should anti-vaxers be excluded from public venues in 2021?

Apps are being developed for individuals to upload details of their COVID-19 vaccinations, creating digital credentials that must be shown in order to enter concert venues, stadiums, movie theaters, offices, and to travel abroad to foreign countries.

8 Answers

Relevance
  • 4 months ago
    Favourite answer

    Private venues should have the ability to set their own standards but making such sweeping rules for all public venues would be a bit troublesome.

    For example, did you know that many in government pushed for gays to be excluded from all manner of public venue and event  back in the days when HIV transmission was not fully understood? 

    My  guess is that many of those supporting such restrictions on civil liberties today might have a different outlook regarding those from the not-so-distant past.

  • 4 months ago

    Wouldn't it be nice if we could take the same approach towards immoral people (AKA Liberals). Their obscene & depraved ways is a social disease and has caused more harm to society than any medical disease. 

  • ?
    Lv 4
    4 months ago

    Personally, no I don’t, not at all. Oh and just for the record, no, I’m not an anti-vaxxer.

    This is a fundamental question of freedom. If we start placing restrictions on what people can and can’t do based on legal choices that they have made, we aren’t too far from a Chinese-style social credit system. 

    I understand completely that we’re in an unprecedented emergency situation and some extreme measures are probably warranted. However, we are walking a VERY fine line here, and I find it disturbing that people seem to think absolutely any amount of authoritarianism is justified if it’s in the interest of public safety and nothing is a step too far.

    I guess if you’ve made the choice that liberty is no longer important and public safety is everything, that’s your choice. I personally am not of that mindset.

  • 4 months ago

    Because you want to move one step closer to a "mark of the Beast" like society. Ignore the long term consequences due to immediate fears and anxieties. 

  • Anonymous
    4 months ago

    Yes, and their health insurance should be cancelled too. Why should we all pay for someone that does not want to protect themself?

  • Steve
    Lv 5
    4 months ago

    Yes. They have the freedom to not get vaccinated, but not the freedom to to infect the rest of us. 

  • 4 months ago

    No. We have freedom in America. If the vaccine is effective, you have nothing to worry about. 

  • Anonymous
    4 months ago

    Anyone without a vaccine should be excluded. Finally my dream is becoming reality. 

Still have questions? Get answers by asking now.