Yahoo Answers is shutting down on 4 May 2021 (Eastern Time) and the Yahoo Answers website is now in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Three more toddlers dead because of feminism.?
Will feminists drop their anti-male stance in laws that kept the father from taking his 3 children away from that evil child butchering woman in California? She later butchered those three children under the protection of feminism and was enabled by the feminized child custody courts that says all men are evil and should be treated like garbage every chance you women get.
Will you feminists ever, EVER look at the pure evil you stand for and the lives its costs??!?
6 Answers
- FoofaLv 72 weeks ago
The Lanterman-Petris-Short Act is what allowed that mentally ill parent to kill her children. It was co-authored by Assembly members Frank D. Lanterman and State Senators Nicholas C. Petris and Alan Short, all men. It was signed into state law by then Governor Ronald Reagan, also a man. So remind us where the "feminism" comes in. This whole family, including the female members of it, were desperately trying to get mental health treatment for this woman. It's not a stupid feminists thing, it's a stupid California thing. This is the reason our state is drowning in mentally ill homeless people. It's against the law to involuntarily commit them.
- Green PuffinLv 72 weeks ago
Usually it's the Father that murders his children, when the relationship breaks down. Whether it's the Mother or the Father that murders their own children, it's most likely that they were suffering some Mental Health Issue and therefore blaming Feminism or any other Political belief system, is rather odd.
- RoValeLv 72 weeks ago
This has nothing to do with feminism. This is a the action of a mentally ill woman. Not only that but where's the father or fathers? I haven't read any mention of them in any article I've found. They probably ran off like many men do when they don't want the responsibility.
Edie: ?, yes men used to automatically win custody but that didn't necessarily mean they raised the children. If they couldn't find new wives or female relatives to care for the children, they would often abandon the children in orphanages. Sometimes they would leave and it would be left to the older children to take in their younger siblings.
- Anonymous2 weeks ago
Some feminists are part of the problem but not the whole problem. Both sides favor women when it comes to child care. Its bullsh*t but that's how it is. Its not feminism that says women should be at home to take care of the kids because they are the nurturing ones. Its become so ingrained in us that women are the ones to care for kids because that's how things have for the most part been since forever and unfortunately its reflected in court. Its something that needs to change. The best interest of the child is all that should be taken into account and the parents gender has nothing to do with that. Mothers are not automatically better parents.
Bill, I literally said some feminists are part of the problem. That was my first sentence. How did you miss it.
The part where I said it has become ingrained in us means people on every side including feminists.
You are one of those people that think women are the ones that should care for kids so why are you even opposed to women getting custody? Either women are the best for kids or they aren't always. You cant have it both ways.
- BillLv 72 weeks ago
Feminists blame the biased courts on the patriarchy. Of course, before feminism fathers had default custody, not women. That fact however is ignored by feminists because they would rather shift blame to the old system than take blame for the situation they caused.
Edit: See what I mean yet? Instead of anonymous admitting that feminists are to blame they shifted blame to the old system and to everyone else. Once again, even when women stayed at home the man had default custody.